Pascal Meis vs Josko Topic Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L L L W W L
Form
L W W W W W W L W LHead-To-Head: Meis 1 - 1 Topic
They have played 6 sets in total, with Meis winning 3 and Topic winning 3. The last match between Meis and Topic was at the Bosnia & Herzegovina F1, 11-05-2015, Semifinals, Clay with Pascal Meis getting the victory 3-6 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Pascal Meis | 1 |
| Josko Topic | 1 |
Bosnia & Herzegovina F1(11-05-2015)
3
6
6
2
6
4
| Meis | Stats | Topic |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 836 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 487 | Highest Rank | 543 |
| 31 | Age | 41 |
| L | Plays | - |
| 3 | Titles | 1 |
| 52% (218-201) | Career Total W/L | 49% (145-150) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $5,695 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS O'Connell PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cerundolo VS Aliassime PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-2 6-4 | |||||
| 4-6 6-3 6-0 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 24 | Games Won | 28 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Pascal Meis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Daniel Masur
Player
Pascal Meis
58%
(
46 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
25 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
21 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pascal Meis
Player
Louroi Martinez
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
3-6 7-5 10-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pascal Meis
Player
Tim Ruehl
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
76%
(
31 of
41)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrien Burdet
Player
Pascal Meis
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
3-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Staeheli
Player
Pascal Meis
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
63)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniele Capecchi
Player
Pascal Meis
74%
(
76 of
103)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
90)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
39 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pascal Meis
Player
Elio Jose Ribeiro Lago
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pascal Meis
Player
Marco Migliorati
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Pascal Meis
67%
(
4 of
6)
1st Serve %
33%
(
2 of
6)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
50%
(
2 of
4)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
0%
(
0 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
4
Total Points Won
8
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Josko Topic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Josko Topic
66%
(
81 of
122)
1st Serve %
76%
(
84 of
110)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
6
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
47 of
84)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
71%
(
10 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
49%
(
60 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
57 of
110)
119
Total Points Won
113
|
6-4 6-7(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Josko Topic
Player
Goran Markovic
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Josko Topic
Player
Thales Turini
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52% (218/201) | Win/Loss | 49% (145/150) |
| 53% (496/442) | Sets Win/Loss | 49% (343/354) |
| 52% (4393/4107) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (3232/3213) |
| 35% (7/13) | Hard Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) |
| 56% (193/154) | Clay Win/Loss | 51% (132/129) |
| 35% (18/34) | Indoor Hard W/L | 42% (11/15) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 667 | Aces Total | 98 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.04 |
| 465 | Total Double Faults | 131 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 536.39 | Average Opponent Rank | 520.84 |
| 62% (9272/14905) | 1st Serve % | 63% (1036/1632) |
| 65% (6018/9272) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (692/1036) |
| 52% (2937/5633) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (249/596) |
| 42% (651/1550) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (58/147) |
| 40% (5954/14724) | Return Points Win % | 39% (588/1508) |
| 0% (0/3) | Main Tour W/L | 24% (6/19) |
| 22% (4/14) | Challenger W/L | 42% (18/25) |
| 54% (214/184) | Futures W/L | 53% (121/106) |
| 53% (215/407) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (142/288) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 51% (43/84) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 41% (32/78) |
| 45% (49/110) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (53/109) |
| 82% (239/197) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 79% (144/114) |
| 18% (239/42) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (144/29) |
| 12% (180/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (151/29) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
